Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Plotting for Suspense

Being a writer has changed the way I read. I'm always asking myself, "How did they do that?" Suspense, in particular, is an element I'm always working to improve and always looking to others to see what works. In this post and some following posts, I'll share what I've learned about creating suspense.

Suspense, first of all, is an anticipation that something is going to happen, usually something bad for the protagonist. It's an integral part of the story and not something that's added on. It builds to a peak at a critical time for the main character. I had an "ah ha" moment about suspense one day when I was looking at a calendar of fantasy cover art. One of these covers showed a warrior woman, sword in hand, on a clump of rock, maybe the top of a mountain, surrounded by a more numerous, better-armed enemy. The "ah ha" was when I realized I was looking at the climax of this woman's story. I don't recall the story or the character, but her future was clearly in doubt at that point. The print was a perfect metaphor for what takes place at the climax of a story, the peak of the action.

At the peak of the action, the hero stands alone against a more powerful opponent.

This print had all of that. The insight for me came when I asked, "How did she get there?" She didn't get up that morning with the idea of climbing a rock by herself and swinging a sword at an army of bad guys. She probably had family, friends, comrades-in-arms. Where were they? Why weren't they helping her? What made her go it alone? I don't think she wanted to go alone. Clearly some of our protagonists are loners, but it's not always by choice. When it comes to our own survival, most of us want some help and backup. Readers of police procedurals know that the call that gets cop cars rolling is "Officer needs assistance." This warrior may have sent such a call, but the assistance never arrived.

Therefore, the first principle of suspense is; Isolate the protagonist.

The next question I asked was, "How did these bad guys get there?" How did they get to be so numerous? How did they get to be so well-armed? Our warrior must have royally pissed someone off. She probably didn't start the day that way. Like most of us, she had problems, but they would have been small ones. None of us want to take on more than we can handle. When things begin to get out of hand, we tend to back off. Obviously, our hero didn't. Her problem grew and she could not escape it.

Therefore, the second principle of suspense is: Grow the problem.

Both of these happen slowly and inexorably in the story. We know before we open the book where the hero will end up--alone and up to her neck in trouble. The hero could be FBI agent-in-training Clarice Starling, in a basement catacomb, in the dark, trying to save a young woman from a serial killer with a handgun and night-vision goggles. She started the day as the junior member of a team. Her job was to gather evidence. Along the way, she became isolated and her problem grew.

Even the quintessential loner heroes like Jack Reacher and John McClain don't start alone. Nor do they set out to fight terrorists in a skyscraper. On the other hand, when the story involves an ensemble such as the men and women of the Dan Kearney Agency, one of the group will end up alone in the final battle.

To get our hero to that peak of the action where he or she stands alone, we must build in events that increase our protagonist's isolation each step of the way and grow the problem, like Audrey the carnivorous plant, right before everybody's eyes. If we do that, the anticipation that something bad is going to happen will increase inexorably.

In my next post, I'll write about some of the ways authors isolate their protagonists.


Jean Henry Mead said...

Good advice, Mark. Sol Stein said in his book, Stein on Writing, that suspense happens when the writer hangs the protagonist off a cliff by his fingertips, then has the villian stomp on his fingers. A little extreme, but it gets the point across. :)

Anonymous said...

Good post, Mark! I saved the permalink on this one. also related to your comment about being a writer changes the way you read. I'm a musician from waaaaay back. I can't just listen to music. I'm always analyzing it - the orchestration/instrumentation, the dynamics, the arrangement, wondering why the bass player used THAT voice, etc., etc., etc., ad infinitum ad naseum. When I took up writing as a career, made it my JOB to learn well, the same thing happened to me with books! I can't just read for enjoyment anymore. I'm like, hmmm - wonder why the sudden change in POV - hey that's a clever phrase, why didn't I think of that? Oh now she's switched from telling style to showing - huh. Like that.

Marilyn said...

Excellent post.

As for reading for enjoyment, I just switch off my editor hat. Takes some doing to learn how--but it makes reading a lot more fun.


Libby McKinmer said...

Great post, Mark! Yes, being a writer (and editor) has changed the way I read, for sure. It's awfully hard to turn off those filters and makes me quite discriminating.


Morgan Mandel said...

Yes, you must be a meanie to your characters and make things as rough as possible, then even worse, so the reader wonders who the hell will they ever get out of this one, then the hard part is you have to think of a way out!

Morgan Mandel

Dana Fredsti said...

I'm pretty good at turning off the critique and reading for enjoyment, but I'll confess before I had my mystery published, I was a LOT harder on mysteries than I am now. Either that or I was choosing all the wrong ones to read. :-)

I generally agree that isolating the protaganist ups the suspense quite a bit - I've read a few horror novels where the author was so good he/she had me on the edge of my seat during scenes where groups of people were in danger...