Writing a mystery means walking a
very fine line.
You want to play fair with the
reader and give him the chance to solve the mystery.
Sort of.
Readers love to play along and see
if they can match/beat your sleuth to the correct solution. In almost every
case (so said because there is an exception to everything) nothing makes
readers angrier than the solution just coming out of the blue with nothing
leading up to it. Worse than that, it’s lazy writing.
So how do you do play fair and
still mystify the reader?
Be sneaky.
Put your clues out there, but make
them appear to be inconsequential, throw-away things that have no relation to
the case. Also put out fake clues leading to a different conclusion (some call
them red herrings, but I don’t like fish), but put them out in two ways – some
as inconsequentials and some as great big whacking things that might as well
have CLUE in blinking neon above them.
No one said you had to play
completely fair, did they?
There’s also a traditional ploy
called a MacGuffin. Sounds sort of like it should be some kind of fast food,
but it’s real – trust me. The MacGuffin is a lovely tool of misdirection.
That’s the word I’ve been looking for – misdirection! Just like a magician, you
direct the reader’s attention in one direction with one hand while the other
hand – in semi-plain view – is actually doing the trick, but no one is really
looking at it.
Anyway, the MacGuffin is what
everyone in the book seems to want – such as everyone believes the vicar was
murdered in a foiled robbery attempt to steal an ancient chalice. All the
characters go rushing around trying to figure out who wanted to steal the
chalice and why, while the vicar was really murdered because his tulips were
certain to win the annual flower show away from the Grande Dame of the village
who dislikes losing. The chalice is only a MacGuffin. Now that’s an extremely
simplistic example, but in reality the MacGuffin is one of the best tools in the
mystery writer’s arsenal.
MacGuffins and misdirection – use
them well, and you will keep your reader happily amused and hopefully confused.
Or is it the other way around?
Janis
Patterson is a seventh-generation Texan and a third-generation wordsmith who
writes mysteries as Janis Patterson, romances and other things as Janis Susan
May, children’s books as Janis Susan Patterson and scholarly works as J.S.M.
Patterson.
Formerly an
actress and singer, a talent agent and Supervisor of Accessioning for a bio-genetic
DNA testing lab, Janis has also been editor-in-chief of two multi-magazine
publishing groups as well as many other things, including an enthusiastic
amateur Egyptologist.
Janis married
for the first time when most of her contemporaries were becoming grandmothers.
Her husband, also an Egyptophile, even proposed in a moonlit garden near the
Pyramids of Giza. Janis and her husband live in Texas with an assortment of rescued
furbabies.
6 comments:
We are a sneaky lot, aren't we, Susan? If we weren't, there'd be no mystery.
Playing fair is the rule, but that doesn't mean we can't do all sorts of things to mislead our readers,and we do. He he!
I love red herrings! But then, I also love anchovies. :) Great post!
Yes, there is a difference between playing fair and letting the cat out of the bag too soon. A good author walks a thin line between revelation and secrecy. Not easy!
Morgan Mandel
http://www.morganmandel.com
I enjoyed your post, Janis. As an Egyptophile and mystery writer, do you enjoy the mystery series about Amelia Peabody Emerson and her clan of archeologist/sleuths?
Ah..the MacGuffin! Sneaky little devils aren't we? Loved it!
Post a Comment