Kathleen Kaska
Sherlock Holmes has become so popular you can find him
almost anywhere—even in outer space. But most of us can’t imagine the Great
Detective without thoughts of Victorian London, or Miss Marple without St. Mary
Mead, or Nero Wolfe without his Manhattan brownstone.
How
much thought do you give to your mystery's setting? Is it mere backdrop or an
integral part of your story?
I think we all agree that
when a story's setting is more than just a physical locale, the story’s plot is
greatly enhanced. And when the setting is powerful enough to become a principal
character, the story is impossible to forget. Take for example Stephen King's
bestseller, The Shining. Had King set
this story in tropical Tahiti, would it have had the same impact? King undoubtedly
could have put a spin on the plot and produced another memorable thriller, but
for those of us who have not yet acquired King’s Midas Touch, it wouldn’t have
worked.
Each
time I've read The Shining I felt the
frigid winter of the Colorado Rockies, the evil spirits haunting the Overlook
Hotel, and the desperation of Wendy Torrance to flee the shackles of her prison
in the blizzard.
My
selection of settings for the Sydney Lockhart series is fairly easy. Each mystery
occurs in an historic hotel. I look for relatively famous ones that are still
in operation. I stay a few nights, study the history, and eventually concoct the
plot. Using the uniqueness of each hotel enhances the atmosphere of each story,
but making the place come alive has its struggles.
When
story and setting work together, you’re on to something big. As much as I love
the place, The Great Gatsby wouldn’t
have worked in Waco.
1 comment:
That is absolutely true. I can't imagine how it would have looked when The Grand Budapest Hotel wasn't filmed in NYC, but at some hotel in Budapest, just because it would've been cheaper.
Post a Comment