by Janis Patterson
Every year or so in one or more of
my writing groups there is a workshop on how to create characters, usually
involving a great long interview sheet full of very detailed questions. Not
just questions about height and eye color and place in the family hierarchy,
but such minutiae as their favorite flavor of Jello, what they did on their
sixth birthday and their maternal great-grandmother’s maiden name. One such
questionnaire ran to six single-spaced pages!
Yet another class advises the writer
to play reporter and interview the character.
This, say the teachers, allows you
to dig closely into the character’s psyche so that you may know him/her
intimately.
I say — well, what I say isn’t
really suitable for such an august forum such as this. If you know the
character so intimately, what keeps him fresh? Shouldn’t you constantly be
discovering new things about him, just as the reader does? Familiarity indeed
breeds contempt.
Still, there are those who believe
in this method and by using it create wonderful characters.
I sort of envy them. They have
control over their people. They can actually create their characters to fit
their desires.
My characters just stomp in, look
around and announce “Here I am.” I have little to nothing to say in the process,
not even about their name. My current heroine and I battled for weeks over her
name. I wanted it to be one thing, she another, and when I wrote with the name
I wanted, she just stood there and became an unresponsive lump of pixels. Only
when I gave in and changed her name to the one she wanted did the story come
alive and start to work. We’re still wrestling about the exact circumstances of
the ending.
Another example is Toby Applegate,
the 7’3” nephew on the run from an unwanted basketball scholarship in my cozy
mystery BEADED TO DEATH. He didn’t even exist in the original concept of the
story. All innocent and unknowing I had my heroine Lilias walking through the
dark to a remote woodsy cabin when suddenly the door opened and there was Toby.
And he wouldn’t go away, either from Lilias or from me. Which, I suppose, is a
good thing, since he has become one of the most beloved characters in my canon.
Another example of a strong-minded
character not following my dictates is Flora Melkiot, the elderly and very
wealthy widow who wormed her way into the position of co-sleuth in another cozy
of mine, EXERCISE IS MURDER. She was in the armature of the story from the
beginning, but not in her final form. I had sketched her in as the catalyst,
but still most definitely a minor character.
There was never anything minor
about Flora Melkiot! From the very first page, Flora was making her not
inconsiderable will felt. She morphed almost instantly from a fussy old lady to
a determined powerhouse who resembled nothing so much as the dark side of Miss
Marple. She was supposed to be the reason for Rebecca’s presence in the
exercise salon at the time of the murder and nothing more; she ended up almost
taking over the entire book. In fact, the next book in the series is pretty
much hers. As a woman raised strictly Southern, I was taught to respect the
wishes of my elders, so I guess Flora is going to get her own series!
Now do I truly believe that, as
some pundits have posited, that writing is nothing but a benign form of possession?
No.
Not really.
Not completely.
I do believe that my subconscious
mind is a powerful force, one that can create what it perceives as reality, and
that if I let it run on a very loose leash it can create wonderful characters
and situations.
But – I’m also very careful never let loose of
the leash!
Janis
Patterson is a seventh-generation Texan and a third-generation wordsmith who
writes mysteries as Janis Patterson, romances and other things as Janis Susan
May, children’s books as Janis Susan Patterson and scholarly works as J.S.M.
Patterson.
7 comments:
Janis,
I'm so happy to hear another writer doesn't do the character bio's. I've always wondered how they do it before writing the story because the character changes with the plot. And I don't know what I don't know.
Great post.
Hi, Janis,
I think it's a good idea to live with a character for a while before you write a word about them. My books, my characters, always do flit around in my head long before I start to write.
I don't really do bios, but as the characters develop, I do keep notes on them. Because they reappear in other books in my series, I want to make sure I don't make any weird changes.
I never do character bios, either. I just let my characters talk to me. It's much more fun and they can be more creative than I can.
I like my characters to surprise me. However, I do keep a list of what they look like so I won't forget. Surprise can only go so far, and I don't want my readers to be surprised by a forgetful author.
Morgan Mandel
http://www.morganmandel.com
I'm like you, Susan. First, I picture characters in my mind, then once I can see them, I push them on stage and let them do what the plot needs from them. I can usually tell when writers have done a complete bio of a character. They can't resist putting a lot of it in the story, even if it's not relevant. Also, like Morgan, I love it when a character surprises me.
I don't do bios either. I like to discover their characteristics along with my readers. But now that I've featured Dana and Sarah in four Logan & Cafferty mysteries, I know them pretty well.
Post a Comment